09_Neural_Networks

Neural network cost function

NNs - one of the most powerful learning algorithms
- Is a learning algorithm for fitting the derived parameters given a training set
- Let's have a first look at a neural network cost function
Focus on application of NNs for classification problems
Here's the set up
- Training set is {(x¹, y¹), (x², y²), (x³, y³) ... (xⁿ, y^m)
- L = number of layers in the network
  - In our example below L = 4
- s_l = number of units (not counting bias unit) in layer l

So here
- l = 4
- s₁ = 3
- s₂ = 5
- s₃ = 5
- s₄ = 4

Types of classification problems with NNs

Two types of classification, as we've previously seen
Binary classification
- 1 output (0 or 1)
- So single output node - value is going to be a real number
- k = 1
  - NB k is number of units in output layer
- s_L = 1
Multi-class classification
- k distinct classifications
- Typically k is greater than or equal to three
- If only two just go for binary
- s_L = k
- So y is a k-dimensional vector of real numbers

Cost function for neural networks

The (regularized) logistic regression cost function is as follows;

For neural networks our cost function is a generalization of this equation above, so instead of one output we generate k outputs

Our cost function now outputs a k dimensional vector
- h_Ɵ(x) is a k dimensional vector, so h_Ɵ(x)_i refers to the ith value in that vector
Costfunction J(Ɵ) is
- [-1/m] times a sum of a similar term to which we had for logic regression
- But now this is also a sum from k = 1 through to K (K is number of output nodes)
  - Summation is a sum over the k output units - i.e. for each of the possible classes
  - So if we had 4 output units then the sum is k = 1 to 4 of the logistic regression over each of the four output units in turn
- This looks really complicated, but it's not so difficult
  - We don't sum over the bias terms (hence starting at 1 for the summation)
    - Even if you do and end up regularizing the bias term this is not a big problem
  - Is just summation over the terms

Woah there - lets take a second to try and understand this!

There are basically two halves to the neural network logistic regression cost function

First half

This is just saying
- For each training data example (i.e. 1 to m - the first summation)
  - Sum for each position in the output vector
This is an average sum of logistic regression

Second half

This is a massive regularization summation term, which I'm not going to walk through, but it's a fairly straightforward triple nested summation
This is also called a weight decay term
As before, the lambda value determines the important of the two halves

The regularization term is similar to that in logistic regression
So, we have a cost function, but how do we minimize this bad boy?!

Summary of what's about to go down

The following section is, I think, the most complicated thing in the course, so I'm going to take a second to explain the general idea of what we're going to do;

We've already described forward propagation
- This is the algorithm which takes your neural network and the initial input into that network and pushes the input through the network
  - It leads to the generation of an output hypothesis, which may be a single real number, but can also be a vector
We're now going to describe back propagation
- Back propagation basically takes the output you got from your network, compares it to the real value (y) and calculates how wrong the network was (i.e. how wrong the parameters were)
- It then, using the error you've just calculated, back-calculates the error associated with each unit from the preceding layer (i.e. layer L - 1)
- This goes on until you reach the input layer (where obviously there is no error, as the activation is the input)
- These "error" measurements for each unit can be used to calculate the partial derivatives
  - Partial derivatives are the bomb, because gradient descent needs them to minimize the cost function
- We use the partial derivatives with gradient descent to try minimize the cost function and update all the Ɵ values
- This repeats until gradient descent reports convergence

A few things which are good to realize from the get go
- There is a Ɵ matrix for each layer in the network
  - This has each node in layer l as one dimension and each node in l+1 as the other dimension
- Similarly, there is going to be a Δ matrix for each layer
  - This has each node as one dimension and each training data example as the other

Back propagation algorithm

We previously spoke about the neural network cost function
Now we're going to deal with back propagation
- Algorithm used to minimize the cost function, as it allows us to calculate partial derivatives!

The cost function used is shown above
- We want to find parameters Ɵ which minimize J(Ɵ)
- To do so we can use one of the algorithms already described such as
  - Gradient descent
  - Advanced optimization algorithms
To minimize a cost function we just write code which computes the following
- J(Ɵ)
  - i.e. the cost function itself!
  - Use the formula above to calculate this value, so we've done that
- Partial derivative terms
  - So now we need some way to do that
    - This is not trivial! Ɵ is indexed in three dimensions because we have separate parameter values for each node in each layer going to each node in the following layer
    - i.e. each layer has a Ɵ matrix associated with it!
      - We want to calculate the partial derivative Ɵ with respect to a single parameter
  - Remember that the partial derivative term we calculate above is a REAL number (not a vector or a matrix)
    - Ɵ is the input parameters
      - Ɵ¹ is the matrix of weights which define the function mapping from layer 1 to layer 2
      - Ɵ₁₀¹ is the real number parameter which you multiply the bias unit (i.e. 1) with for the bias unit input into the first unit in the second layer
      - Ɵ₁₁¹ is the real number parameter which you multiply the first (real) unit with for the first input into the first unit in the second layer
      - Ɵ₂₁¹ is the real number parameter which you multiply the first (real) unit with for the first input into the second unit in the second layer
      - As discussed, Ɵ_ij^l i
        i here represents the unit in layer l+1 you're mapping to (destination node)
        j is the unit in layer l you're mapping from (origin node)
        l is the layer your mapping from (to layer l+1) (origin layer)
        NB
        The terms destination node, origin node and origin layer are terms I've made up!
  - So - this partial derivative term is
    - The partial derivative of a 3-way indexed dataset with respect to a real number (which is one of the values in that dataset)
- Gradient computation
- - One training example
  - Imagine we just have a single pair (x,y) - entire training set
  - How would we deal with this example?
  - The forward propagation algorithm operates as follows
  - - Layer 1
      - a¹ = x
      - z² = Ɵ¹a¹
    - Layer 2
      - a² = g(z²) (add a₀²)
      - z³ = Ɵ²a²
    - Layer 3
      - a³ = g(z³) (add a₀³)
      - z⁴ = Ɵ³a³
    - Output
    - - a⁴ = h_Ɵ(x) = g(z⁴)

- This is the vectorized implementation of forward propagation
  - Lets compute activation values sequentially (below just re-iterates what we had above!)

What is back propagation?

Use it to compute the partial derivatives
Before we dive into the mechanics, let's get an idea regarding the intuition of the algorithm
- For each node we can calculate (δ_j^l) - this is the error of node j in layer l
  - If we remember, a_j^l is the activation of node j in layer l
  - Remember the activation is a totally calculated value, so we'd expect there to be some error compared to the "real" value
    - The delta term captures this error
    - But the problem here is, "what is this 'real' value, and how do we calculate it?!"
      - The NN is a totally artificial construct
      - The only "real" value we have is our actual classification (our y value) - so that's where we start
If we use our example and look at the fourth (output) layer, we can first calculate
- δ_j⁴= a_j⁴- y_j
  - [Activation of the unit] - [the actual value observed in the training example]
  - We could also write a_j⁴as h_Ɵ(x)_j
    - Although I'm not sure why we would?
- This is an individual example implementation
Instead of focussing on each node, let's think about this as a vectorized problem
- δ⁴= a⁴- y
  - So here δ⁴is the vector of errors for the 4th layer
  - a⁴is the vector of activation values for the 4th layer
With δ⁴calculated, we can determine the error terms for the other layers as follows;
Taking a second to break this down
- Ɵ³is the vector of parameters for the 3->4 layer mapping
- δ⁴is (as calculated) the error vector for the 4th layer
- g'(z³) is the first derivative of the activation function g evaluated by the input values given by z³
  - You can do the calculus if you want (...), but when you calculate this derivative you get
  - g'(z³) = a³. * (1 - a³)
- So, more easily
  - δ³= (Ɵ³)^Tδ⁴. *(a³. * (1 - a³))
- . * is the element wise multiplication between the two vectors
  - Why element wise? Because this is essentially an extension of individual values in a vectorized implementation, so element wise multiplication gives that effect
  - We highlighted it just in case you think it's a typo!

Analyzing the mathematics

And if we take a second to consider the vector dimensionality (with our example above [3-5-5-4])
- Ɵ³ = is a matrix which is [4 X 5] (if we don't include the bias term, 4 X 6 if we do)
  - (Ɵ³)^T = therefore, is a [5 X 4] matrix
- δ⁴ = is a 4x1 vector
- So when we multiply a [5 X 4] matrix with a [4 X 1] vector we get a [5 X 1] vector
- Which, low and behold, is the same dimensionality as the a³vector, meaning we can run our pairwise multiplication

For δ³when you calculate the derivative terms you get
a³. * (1 - a³)
Similarly For δ² when you calculate the derivative terms you get
a². * (1 - a²)
- So to calculate δ² we do
  δ²= (Ɵ²)^Tδ³. *(a². * (1 - a²))
There's no δ¹ term
- Because that was the input!

Why do we do this?

We do all this to get all the δ terms, and we want the δ terms because through a very complicated derivation you can use δ to get the partial derivative of Ɵ with respect to individual parameters (if you ignore regularization, or regularization is 0, which we deal with later)

= a_j^lδ_i^(l+1)
By doing back propagation and computing the delta terms you can then compute the partial derivative terms
- We need the partial derivatives to minimize the cost function!

Putting it all together to get the partial derivatives!

What is really happening - lets look at a more complex example
Training set of m examples
First, set the delta values
- Set equal to 0 for all values
- Eventually these Δ values will be used to compute the partial derivative
  - Will be used as accumulators for computing the partial derivatives
Next, loop through the training set
- i.e. for each example in the training set (dealing with each example as (x,y)
- Set a¹(activation of input layer) = xⁱ
- Perform forward propagation to compute a^lfor each layer (l = 1,2, ... L)
  - i.e. run forward propagation
- Then, use the output label for the specific example we're looking at to calculate δ^L where δ^L= a^L- yⁱ
  - So we initially calculate the delta value for the output layer
  - Then, using back propagation we move back through the network from layer L-1 down to layer
- Finally, use Δ to accumulate the partial derivative terms
- Note here
  - l = layer
  - j = node in that layer
  - i = the error of the affected node in the target layer
- You can vectorize the Δ expression too, as
Finally
- After executing the body of the loop, exit the for loop and compute
- - When j = 0 we have no regularization term
At the end of ALL this
- You've calculated all the D terms above using Δ
  - NB - each D term above is a real number!
- We can show that each D is equal to the following
- We have calculated the partial derivative for each parameter
- - We can then use these in gradient descent or one of the advanced optimization algorithms
Phew!
- What a load of hassle!

Back propagation intuition

Some additionally back propagation notes
- In case you found the preceding unclear, which it shouldn't be as it's fairly heavily modified with my own explanatory notes
Back propagation is hard(ish...)
- But don't let that discourage you
- It's hard in as much as it's confusing - it's not difficult, just complex
Looking at mechanical steps of back propagation

Forward propagation with pictures!

Feeding input into the input layer (xⁱ, yⁱ)
- Note that x and y here are vectors from 1 to n where n is the number of features
  - So above, our data has two features (hence x₁ and x₂)
With out input data present we use forward propagation

The sigmoid function applied to the z values gives the activation values
- Below we show exactly how the z value is calculated for an example

Back propagation

With forwardprop done we move on to do back propagation
Back propagation is doing something very similar to forward propagation, but backwards
- Very similar though
Let's look at the cost function again...
- Below we have the cost function if there is a single output (i.e. binary classification)

This function cycles over each example, so the cost for one example really boils down to this

Which, we can think of as a sigmoidal version of the squared difference (check out the derivation if you don't believe me)
- So, basically saying, "how well is the network doing on example i "?
We can think about a δ term on a unit as the "error" of cost for the activation value associated with a unit
- More formally (don't worry about this...), δ is
  - Where cost is as defined above
  - Cost function is a function of y value and the hypothesis function
So - for the output layer, back propagation sets the δ value as [a - y]
- Difference between activation and actual value
We then propagate these values backwards;

Looking at another example to see how we actually calculate the delta value;

So, in effect,
- Back propagation calculates the δ, and those δ values are the weighted sum of the next layer's delta values, weighted by the parameter associated with the links
- Forward propagation calculates the activation (a) values, which
Depending on how you implement you may compute the delta values of the bias values
- However, these aren't actually used, so it's a bit inefficient, but not a lot more!

Implementation notes - unrolling parameters (matrices)

Needed for using advanced optimization routines

Is the MATLAB/octave code
- But theta is going to be matrices
fminunc takes the costfunction and initial theta values
- These routines assume theta is a parameter vector
- Also assumes the gradient created by costFunction is a vector
For NNs, our parameters are matrices
- e.g.

Example

Use the thetaVec = [ Theta1(:); Theta2(:); Theta3(:)]; notation to unroll the matrices into a long vector
To go back you use
- Theta1 = resape(thetaVec(1:110), 10, 11)

Gradient checking

Backpropagation has a lot of details, small bugs can be present and ruin it :-(
- This may mean it looks like J(Ɵ) is decreasing, but in reality it may not be decreasing by as much as it should
So using a numeric method to check the gradient can help diagnose a bug
- Gradient checking helps make sure an implementation is working correctly
Example
- Have an function J(Ɵ)
- Estimate derivative of function at point Ɵ (where Ɵ is a real number)
- How?
- - Numerically
  - - Compute Ɵ + ε
    - Compute Ɵ - ε
    - Join them by a straight line
    - Use the slope of that line as an approximation to the derivative

Usually, epsilon is pretty small (0.0001)
- If epsilon becomes REALLY small then the term BECOMES the slopes derivative
The is the two sided difference (as opposed to one sided difference, which would be J(Ɵ + ε) - J(Ɵ) /ε
If Ɵ is a vector with n elements we can use a similar approach to look at the partial derivatives

So, in octave we use the following code the numerically compute the derivatives

So on each loop thetaPlus = theta except for thetaPlus(i)
- Resets thetaPlus on each loop
Create a vector of partial derivative approximations
Using the vector of gradients from backprop (DVec)
- Check that gradApprox is basically equal to DVec
- Gives confidence that the Backproc implementation is correc
Implementation note
- Implement back propagation to compute DVec
- Implement numerical gradient checking to compute gradApprox
- Check they're basically the same (up to a few decimal places)
- Before using the code for learning turn off gradient checking
- - Why?
  - - GradAprox stuff is very computationally expensive
    - In contrast backprop is much more efficient (just more fiddly)

Random initialization

Pick random small initial values for all the theta values
- If you start them on zero (which does work for linear regression) then the algorithm fails - all activation values for each layer are the same
So chose random values!
- Between 0 and 1, then scale by epsilon (where epsilon is a constant)

Putting it all together

1) - pick a network architecture
- Number of
- - Input units - number of dimensions x (dimensions of feature vector)
  - Output units - number of classes in classification problem
  - Hidden units
  - - Default might be
      - 1 hidden layer
    - Should probably have
      - Same number of units in each layer
      - Or 1.5-2 x number of input features
    - Normally
  - - - More hidden units is better
      - But more is more computational expensive
- We'll discuss architecture more later

2) - Training a neural network
- 2.1) Randomly initialize the weights
  - Small values near 0
- 2.2) Implement forward propagation to get h_Ɵ(x)ⁱ for any xⁱ
- 2.3) Implement code to compute the cost function J(Ɵ)
- 2.4) Implement back propagation to compute the partial derivatives
- General implementation below

for i = 1:m {

Forward propagation on (xⁱ, yⁱ) --> get activation (a) terms

Back propagation on (xⁱ, yⁱ) --> get delta (δ) terms

Compute Δ := Δ^l + δ^l+1(a^l)^T

}

With this done compute the partial derivative terms

- Notes on implementation
- - Usually done with a for loop over training examples (for forward and back propagation)
  - Can be done without a for loop, but this is a much more complicated way of doing things
  - Be careful

2.5) Use gradient checking to compare the partial derivatives computed using the above algorithm and numerical estimation of gradient of J(Ɵ)
- Disable the gradient checking code for when you actually run it
2.6) Use gradient descent or an advanced optimization method with back propagation to try to minimize J(Ɵ) as a function of parameters Ɵ
- Here J(Ɵ) is non-convex
  - Can be susceptible to local minimum
  - In practice this is not usually a huge problem
  - Can't guarantee programs with find global optimum should find good local optimum at least

e.g. above pretending data only has two features to easily display what's going on
- Our minimum here represents a hypothesis output which is pretty close to y
- If you took one of the peaks hypothesis is far from y
Gradient descent will start from some random point and move downhill
- Back propagation calculates gradient down that hill

09: Neural Networks - Learning